Today

The Unholy Trinity: What We Can Do To Survive and Prosper

The "unholy trinity" is a worst case scenario where three global problems occur at the same time to create widespread disruption to environmental, political and economic systems. The Institute for Alternative Futures, one of the leading scientifically-based futurist organizations first described this scenario in their March, 2008 Newsletter. It doesn’t take a crystal ball to look into today’s headlines and recognize that we are in deep trouble. In fact, what we are seeing is the end of an unsustainable world based on the pursuit of empire and the birth of a new earth-centered world based on cooperative local economies. Here’s what you need to know in order to survive and prosper in this new world.

Even with our focus on population control, the earth's population will quickly grow to seven, eight and eventually nine billion people this century. The way these billions of people are relating to the earth has created the “holy trinity.”

  • The challenge of peak oil will force us to alter the way we use energy for power generation, transmission and transportation. The choice will be regression to a simpler, older way of life that uses less energy or accelerated research into ways to conserve energy and improve the efficiency of alternatives to oil and coal.
  • The second unholy problem comes when our use of oil and coal accelerates the climate change that has already started. Global warming will spark widespread environmental problems including water shortages in the American West, flooding due to melting ice caps in India, severe drought cycles in Africa and widespread disruption in Europe due to international migration.
  • The third problem in "the unholy trinity" is a global economic downturn that pulls people everywhere into a cycle of stagnation and inflation that lands us somewhere between recession and depression. The cost of energy surging makes food and travel ever more expensive, and more businesses see costs rise and sales fall which leads them to cut their workforce.

The good news is that this economic downturn is likely to stop our unsustainable use of the earth’s resources. The even better news is that it will help turn us toward a way of life that is simpler, greener, more local, less stressful, and more fun. I just heard an interview on New Dimensions Radio with Barbara Leger, Science of Mind Minister, who offered five simple guidelines for surviving and prospering in the world that we are moving into:

1. Free your heart from hatred.
2. Rid your mind of worry.
3. Live more simply.
4. Give more.
5. Expect less.

I’d amend her last suggestion to say. “Expect less of the things that money can buy, but expect more of the things that we don’t need money to have including peace of mind, more time for love and friendship, greater connection to the natural world.”

Al Gore recently gave a speech that lays the foundation for a major change of focus that can address all three of these seemingly intractable crises. I found it quite incredible. You can read about and see the video of the talk at: http://www.alternet.org/blogs/video/91902/.

He is saying what many of us know to be true. "We're borrowing money from China to buy oil from the Persian Gulf to burn it in ways that destroy the planet. Every bit of that's got to change." He calls on us all to commit ourselves to a new path. "Today I challenge our nation to commit to producing 100 percent of our electricity from renewable energy and truly clean carbon-free sources within 10 years."

Outside the forum, a cavalcade of anti-Gore protest organizations lined the streets, trying to make their counter-arguments. Lyndon LaRouche's partisans handed out a glossy flier entitled "The Implications of the Gore Hoax for International Policy." Other wags took up mock-collection plates to pay for Gore's own carbon footprint. But inside the hall, Gore's references to such past government efforts as the Marshall Plan and President Kennedy's call to reach the moon tapped a vein of enthusiasm in the crowd that resulted in a standing ovation as he left the stage.

In a statement released after Gore's speech, Barack Obama registered his support:

For decades, Al Gore has challenged the skeptics in Washington on climate change and awakened the conscience of a nation to the urgency of this threat. I strongly agree with Vice President Gore that we cannot drill our way to energy independence, but must fast-track investments in renewable sources of energy like solar power, wind power and advanced biofuels, and those are the investments I will make as President. It's a strategy that will create millions of new jobs that pay well and cannot be outsourced, and one that will leave our children a world that is cleaner and safer.

As I sit here in my California office, surrounded by fires that are still burning as a result of freak lightening strikes that are clearly related to global warming and its effects on our weather, I know we need change now.

What do you think? Do we need a Marshall Plan type effort to combat these problems? Is Gore on the right track? Which Presidential nominee would more likely help in these efforts if he were elected?

Please visit me at www.MenAlive.com to receive my free e-newsletter.

peonies's picture
Frank, I hate to see you go. We had such good interchanges of ideas on the old blog. I hope your wife is well. Please write me at Neenygrik@aol.com. Love, Joan
frankiarmz's picture
Just wanted to say goodbye to All. I have enjoyed the many thought and conversation provoking blogs and the many friendships ThirdAge has provided in the past. I don't know if the word "Blog" still applies as it is too dead here and the format too uninviting. My deepest thanks to the experts like Jed who gave their time and knowledge. Take care my friends...
peonies's picture
Jed, I second the motion with Frank B. When something ain't broken don't fix it. There was a camaraderie on the old Third Age that is not being invited on this new one. We had healthy discussions and sometime didn't always agree but it was like sitting on the old porch of the general store in the middle of town, just chewing the fat. Ya know what I mean? As to Al Gore I think he is brilliant and a man ahead of his time years ago when he warned us that we would come upon all these global warming issues. I think the absolute best ticket would be Obama and Gore, but this won't be, so I would really have to think on who would be a good veep. I guess I will have lots of time to do this with this new forum because no one seems to be here anymore. J. Rhodes
Bernolowell's picture
We have  had several scares before, especially the oil embargo of the 1970's, yet we always seem to take the path that abuses the limited resources even more.   Our Congress and Executive have already had close to 40 years to react, but have done next to nothing.  Our 'stategic petroleum reserve' should have been implemented with a parallel plan to reduce our dependencies on foreign oil, but even today, no such plan exists.  The addictions we've got are quite similar to those I've noticed with tobacco.  In 1963, we were given a warning from the Surgeon General that smoking and other uses of tobacco were harmful to our health.  What happened?  By my own observations of the sector that I dealt within retail, the customers soon were back to their habits in about three months after the 'panic' saw a drastic drop in cigarette sales. One of my uncles was so concerned about the energy crisis that in the 1980's he s installed lighting in a lavatory that would come on only when the door was closed.   He had some 'privy'  to that information, especially as he had been an executive with an electric utility.  Industries continue to pollute, especially as our laissez-faire President has chosen to play favorites with the people who funded his Presidential campaigns, either directly or 'under the table'.  In 2004, I wrote ('my' in the following text refers to George W. Bush): "Many more people than on 911 will die or become ill From the toxic fumes that from those polluting smokestacks continue to spill. Death will come much more slowly for those with incurable ills And my pals the pharmaceuticals will sell many more pills. The great unspoiled beauty of Alaska will all disappear, All thanks to my new exploration policy, have no fear."   Indeed, our President has had the same policies for years, but needed a 'panic' to get the Congress to act on them.   Does this sound familiar? What about the fear of WMD and the 'mushroom cloud'? We've got to act, but we do not need the incessant use of fear to drive us to decisions that will destroy our life on this planet.  John McCain seems to be the candidate who has 'sold out' the most to the same fear policies, especially regarding the false belief that nuclear power is safe. Clearly, it is not - and we face a serious problem even now with the safe disposal of lethal nuclear wastes.  Even the 'safe' nuclear ships and submarines we have are unsafe as recently reported by the problem with leakage in Japan.  The facility at Hanford, Washington has shown that, especially as supposedly safe nuclear waste  disposal has resulted in severe problems with leakage.  Much nuclear waste sits in pools at every nuclear power plant, awaiting a new 'nirvana' for its safe disposal.  Honestly, both candidates currently pose us with the dilemna - which one will employ the fear factor more to get us to make a 'snap' impulsive decision?       
frankiarmz's picture
Jed, if the absence of comments on these blogs is any indication of how people are responding to this new format, I strongly suggest a move to the old format be considered. Instead of the many blog topics being boldy presented along with recent activity, visitors are met with a rather bland and sort of uninviting page which is fine if they are here to learn abou the fine authors such as yourself. Maybe interaction will increase, but it just does not strike me as efficient and helpful as the old ThirdAge. I wish you and the others continued success and hope I am wrong. Frank B.
Ads by Google