Diabetes? Some Beat It, But Are They Cured?

JoAnne Zoller Wagner's diagnosis as prediabetic wasn't enough to compel her to change her habits and lose 30 pounds. Not even with the knowledge her sister had died because of diabetes.

"I didn't have that sense of urgency," said the Pasadena, Md., woman.

But nine months later, doctors told Wagner her condition had worsened. She, too, now had Type 2 diabetes.

That scared her into action.

Now, two years later, the 55-year-old woman has slimmed down. She exercises regularly and her blood sugar levels are back in the healthy, normal range. Thanks to her success, she was able to avoid diabetes medication.

Diabetics like Wagner who manage to turn things around, getting their blood sugar under control -- either escaping the need for drugs or improving enough to quit taking them -- are drawing keen interest from the medical community.

This summer an American Diabetes Association task force will focus on this group of patients and whether they can be considered "cured." Among the points of interest:

  • What blood sugar range qualifies as a cure and how long would it have to be maintained?
  • How might blood pressure and cholesterol, both linked to diabetes, figure into the equation? 
  • And what if a "cured" diabetic's blood sugar soars again?

"For right now, we're not saying they're cured, but the bottom line is ... good glucose control, less infections," said Sue McLaughlin, president of health care and education for the American Diabetes Association. The organization has no estimate of how many people fall into that category.

Being overweight is the leading risk for Type 2 diabetes. Genetics also plays a role, and blacks, Hispanics and American Indians are at greater risk than whites.

Nearly 57 million Americans are prediabetic. Another 18 million have been diagnosed with diabetes, while the diabetes association estimates almost 6 million more Americans have diabetes and don't know it. About 90 to 95 percent of diabetics have Type 2, the kind linked to obesity.

The future is potentially even gloomier, with one study estimating that one of every three children born in the U.S. in 2000 will eventually develop diabetes.

But the news isn't all bad. Thirty minutes of daily exercise and a 5 to 10 percent loss in body weight can lower the odds of diabetes by nearly 60 percent and is more effective than medicine in delaying its onset, according to a diabetes prevention study.

Still, such lifestyle changes are often difficult.

Source: , Associated Press/AP Online
CWWJ's picture
Not all Type 2 diabetics have or had an obesity problem. I developed diabetes at age 68, never having been even slightly overweight. Further, I have been an inveterate exerciser for more than 30 years, and at the time of my diagnosis was running 15 - 20 miles per week plus doing circuit weight training. I am asymptomatic after 9 years, but I have never been able to control my blood sugar without a combination of several medications plus continuing exercise. No one on either side of my family tree ever suffered from diabetes. My doctor informs me that about five percent (or less) of late diagnosis Type 2 diabetics had zero risk factors for developing the disease. Has anyone had a similar experience?.
adrif's picture
In the past 3 years my fasting blood sugar has gone from 96, 101, 106. Also in the past 2 years my hypothyroidism was finally diagnosed so I lost 60 pounds and my LDL chloresterol went down 60 points. Yet my fasting blood sugar keeps going up. I exercise fairly regularly but a month ago joined Curves and now am working out 30 to 45 minutes 5 days a week. I do not need to loose weight so that isn't the answer. My diet is very healthy. I am hoping adding this new exercising to my other exercise will help. We shall see. But diet and weight loss alone did not help.
Greg Beamer's picture
The medical community started with 146 as the level when I first started and was diagnosed type 2. It was then dropped to 125. The true test of control is the A1C. I think the reason the medical establishment doesn't want to say it is "cured" is that it would create chaos among the insurance companies. The way it is now, once we have this on our record, we are jacked out of preferred life insurance premiums, being able to change health care providers (can't get even a simple policy through AARP), and have higher premiums. If we would be able to receive a release that we are "cured" by having normal A1C levels for 2 years, and the insurance companies would reverse their "blacklist" trend, then I can see the reason for proceeding with the process. If not, then it is all symantics, and a waste of time on all fronts.
Ads by Google