Dr. Sidney Wolfe, Public Citizens watchdog on the issue, said the Crestor study showed it increased the risk of diabetes, while its absolute benefit was small, preventing only one heart attack or stoke for 120 patients over two years. Any cheaper generic statin, he said, should provide the same benefit as Crestor without some of the risks.

Critics also note the study was conducted by a holder of the CRP test patent and paid for by Crestors maker, AstraZeneca, which stands to make billions of dollars if Crestor use increases significantly.

Currently, guidelines set by the American Heart Association and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control say people should take statins if they have high CRP combined with other risk factors such as high cholesterol, being overweight, smoking, lack of exercise, high blood pressure or diabetes.

Dr. Leonard Cerullo, founder of the Chicago Institute of Neurosurgery, called the new study results that show statins help even people with low cholesterol levels "remarkable."

They raise the question, he said, of whether the currently accepted levels of cholesterol are too high.

For a patient with low cholesterol but high CRP and other risk factors, he said, he would now consider prescribing statins.

Similarly, Dr. David Cooke, a cardiologist and president of the Midwest affiliate of the American Heart Association, said if someone has moderate risk for heart attack or stroke, high CRP should be enough to qualify them for statins.

A panel of experts will look at the question and try to establish new guidelines sometime next year.

Because those taking Crestor had only 74 fewer heart attacks and strokes out of nearly 18,000 patients, and because a Crestor prescription costs more than $1,000 a year, an editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine cautioned against routine CRP measurement and Crestor use until more is known to weigh the costs and benefits.

Until then, the doctors advise, patients should check with their physicians to see if they have risk factors for heart attack or stroke that would make them candidates for a CRP test and for statin treatment.

Source: YellowBrix, Daily Herald; Arlington Heights, Ill.
tinnnk's picture
My doctor wanted to give me crestor, and I refused. My labwork was done right after the holidays and I had been eating things I don't usually have......I told him I would take fish oils and he added niaspan to that, so I am on Lovasa 2 tabs bid and Niaspan 500 mg qhs. My triglycerides were 243 and cholesterol 205, LDL Cholesterol 122, VLDL Cholesterol 49, HDL Cholesterol 34, which has been as low as 28 in the past so this is improved in my eyes), he also did my waist measurement and told me I have metabolic syndrome. I am not obese, and not 30 yrs old anymore. Sometimes I think docs can be pill pushers for the pharmaceutical companies, and to my understanding he is now a licensed lipidologist(sp?) I feel fine and have to repeat my labs on the 10th of Feb with a follow up on the 16th to see him. I don't want to take any statins as I have seen too many ppl with problems taking them, even to the extent of ending up on a vent, with liver failure......I am an RN, also.
flowersoft's picture
Are Crestor and Lipitor similar drugs?
Ads by Google