Each year hundreds of thousands of Americans get on a treadmill to try to determine whether their hearts are healthy.
Why, then, do we hear about people whose results on the test are normal and yet they die shortly after of a heart attack?
The most prominent, of course, was Tim Russert, the NBC journalist who died earlier this year six weeks after getting normal results on such a test.
Dr. Todd D. Miller, a cardiologist and co-director of the Mayo Clinic's Nuclear Cardiology Laboratory in Rochester, Minn., elaborated on his recently published assessment of the test's ability to predict the presence of life-threatening cardiac problems.
The test is meant to be used "almost exclusively" for people who have symptoms of heart disease, Dr. Miller emphasized.
"But in the real world," he said, "it is often used as a screening test for people without symptoms who are worried about their risk. The accuracy of the test depends on whom it is used. It is most accurate among populations with a high prevalence of coronary disease. But in most people without symptoms, the prevalence of disease is so low that the accuracy of the test is low, too."
Limitations and advantages. In fact, this test is unable to detect the kind of problem that caused Russert's death -- a plaque within the wall of a coronary artery that ruptured, resulting in a clot that set off a rapidly fatal heart rhythm abnormality. If not for the rhythm disturbance, Russert would have had a far greater chance of surviving, said Dr. Miller, who was not one of his physicians.
Russert's treadmill test may have put him in the low-risk category, Dr. Miller said, "but that doesn't mean no risk.""Maybe 3 patients in 1,000 with a low-risk test will die from heart disease within a year," he said. "Among those deemed at high risk, more than 3 patients in 100 would die within a year."Furthermore, when the stress test is used for people who are at low risk for heart disease, an abnormal finding is most often a false positive that prompts further testing that is far more costly, Dr. Miller said.The stress test's main advantages are its rapidity and low cost - - one-fifth to one-quarter the cost of more definitive and often more time-consuming tests like a nuclear stress test, CT coronary angiogram or standard angiogram.But the test has no value unless its findings are interpreted in the context of a person's other risk factors for heart disease: age, sex and heart disease symptoms, as well as smoking, being overweight, hypertension, high cholesterol, diabetes and family history.Three main arteries feed the heart, and the ability of a stress test to pick up narrowing of an artery is better if more than one artery is clogged, Dr. Miller said.The treadmill test seeks to answer two questions: "Does the patient have coronary artery disease, and is he or she likely to die or suffer a coronary event soon?" Dr. Miller wrote in the Cleveland Clinic journal. But at best it can provide only an estimate of someone's risk of having a heart attack or dying of heart disease within a given period of time.
Interpreting the results. During a treadmill test, patients are hooked up to an electrocardiogram machine (often abbreviated EKG) that records the workings of the heart as the duration, speed and difficulty of the exercise increase.Measurements taken during and immediately after the workout are indicators of cardiovascular fitness: how long the person can continue as the treadmill's speed and incline gradually increase; whether blood pressure drops instead of rising; whether the heart rate increases to an age-appropriate level and how fast it recovers when the test ends.Doctors used to rely mainly on an EKG finding called ST-segment depression to indicate heart trouble. But scores of studies have zeroed in on other, more reliable findings. Exercise duration has the strongest prognostic value, Dr. Miller said. "The longer the patient can keep going on the treadmill, the less likely he or she is to die soon of coronary artery disease -- or of any cause," he wrote.Even people who have three diseased coronary arteries can be expected to survive four years or more if they can stay on the treadmill for 12 or more minutes, a study in the 1980s showed.But duration on the treadmill may be limited by lack of physical fitness, back problems or other unrelated disorders, leading to other, more expensive evaluations.
Measurements and Diagnoses. Duration on a treadmill is a measure of exercise capacity -- the workload the body can achieve expressed as metabolic equivalents, or METs, a multiple of the amount of oxygen the body uses at rest. The average middle-age man can reach 10 to 12 METs, about 2 more than the average woman, Dr. Miller said.Blood pressure that is lower during the treadmill exercise than when the person is standing at rest often indicates severe coronary disease -- a heart unable to meet the demand -- and has been linked to a threefold increase in the risk of a cardiac event within two years, a study of 2,036 patients showed.A normal heart beats faster during exercise and slows as soon as exercise stops. Failure of the heart rate to increase as expected, a condition called chronotropic incompetence, is associated with an increased risk of death from heart disease, a study by the Cleveland Clinic Foundation showed. The risk of death within six years is also doubled if the person's heart rate fails to fall quickly when the treadmill stops.Finally, various heart rhythm abnormalities may occur during the test. Most are benign, but a rhythm disturbance called ventricular ectopy is linked to a somewhat raised death rate over the next five years.The bottom line? A stress test result is only one factor in estimating a person's risk of dying soon of heart disease. And, Dr. Miller added, "We'd all be a lot better off if we became more active."THE New York Times / Jez BurrowsOriginally published by JANE E BRODY, The New York Times.(c) 2008 Providence Journal. Provided by ProQuest LLC. All rights Reserved.
