Affair Can Cut Much Deeper When There's an Emotional Bond

COLUMBIA, S.C. -- The e-mails between Gov. Mark Sanford and a woman in Argentina spell out their relationship in excruciating detail.

Addressed to "My Love," "Sweetest" and "My Beloved," the words express a sensual and emotional bond rather than a brief fling.

And that can make the pain sharper, deeper and longer-lasting, family therapists said.

"This wasn't a dalliance," said Linda Olson, director of the Columbia Pastoral Counseling Center. "It makes it much harder. The emotional involvement is much more profound and much deeper. Anybody who was watching it unfold just sees so much pain for all involved.

"The emotional involvement is equally as difficult to get past as the sexuality betrayal," Olson said. "And it's hard to forget.""

Everyone the governor, first lady Jenny Sanford, the Sanford children, his mistress in Buenos Aires is affected by it. And where does it go from here?

"I certainly believe people can survive long-term affairs by kind of restructuring their marriage in a way that the fidelity is there and the trust is re-established," said Jennifer Savitz, a licensed professional counselor in Columbia.

But, therapists agree, it takes a lot of time and a commitment to work things out.

"With any couple, what's been destroyed is the element of trust. That's not something you say is fixed and it's fixed," said Kevin King, a Columbia psychologist. "It takes time for rebuilding and re- establishing the commitment to the relationship."

And even then, it's hard to predict the long-term outcome.

"I've worked with couples who can't work through a text messaging affair when there was no physical touching," said Diane Gehard, a marriage and family therapy professor at California State University- Northridge. "And I've worked with others where there was an intensive physical relationship for several years. They spend several years working through things and, at the end, they'll say the affair was the best thing that ever happened because they were able to work to a level of honesty and intimacy."

Source: YellowBrix, Herald; Rock Hill, S.C.
tb's picture
Cheating on a marriage is always wrong, no matter what the justification is. If you are that unfulfilled or that unhappy, do the adult thing, save everyone the embarrassment and additional pain, and leave the marriage the right way. If the Gov. marriage was so bad, why didn't he leave before he went on to the next person. I'm sure if the marriage was so bad for him, it was worse for her. I have no sympathy for a woman who knowingly dates a married man -it's a no win situation, everyone gets hurt.
DrJoeGadd's picture
Ignore Gov Sanford’s critics and naysayers. They, like Sanford’s wife, are guilty of spousal depravation, presumption, and possessive greed. They squawk hoping to justify their marital sins and enlist support opposing the laws of nature and love.
DrJoeGadd's picture
The sympathy and support should be given to Gov. Sanford. His wife failed to please or satisfy some components …..which Marie fulfilled. Worse, his wife, if she was/is truly dedicated to her husband and his happiness should have facilitated and encouraged a Marie. His kids and your readers are getting fraudulent messages that deprivation, denial, and possessive fidelity are desirable….when the real infidelities are a spouse’s failure to fulfill or arrange fulfillment. Imagine a wonderful world where everyone truly cared for another’s happiness.
terriland's picture
I don't feel sorry for her. This is not her first affair outside of her marriage. Mark Sanford was sucked in by her. She goes after other high profile people. I feel sorry for his family.
vikingchild's picture
The toughest lesson ever learned is not to mess with another womans' man. Ladies, don't do this to your sisters out there! It will come back to bite you 20 fold.
hisredeemed's picture
I agree that I have no sympathy for the mistress. She knowingly went into a sexual and intimate affair with a married man and I'm quite sure she knew who he was and was into it for the fringe benefits, as well. As a woman she knows what kind of devastation this does to another woman's heart. She cared only for herself. What I don't understand is WHY you would want a man of such poor character to start with! If he did it to her what makes you think you're so fabulous he won't do it to you? I used to live in South Carolina and formerly thought of Mark Sanford as one of the last good guys. It just goes to show you that even the outwardly moral men think only with their sex organs and to hell with what it does to your wife and kids!! All they do is say,"Oh, my wife doesn't stroke my ego anymore.." Hey, buddy, when's the last time you stroked hers??? Women don't turn into 'shrews' for NO GOOD REASON!! Get over yourself!!
painterblue's picture
Sorry, but my sympathies do not lie with the affair partner. She voluntarily entered into a relationship that was destined to cause permanent damage to at least four children, another woman, the constituents of South Carolina and - here's the kicker - her lover and herself! A person of integrity acting in love would have refused to close the triangle by suggesting that the potential affair partner set right his existing affairs before starting an affair with her. While I would imagine that this woman does need support and care, that support and care might be most effective if it encourages her to examine her own lack of appropriate boundaries, opportunism and neediness that led her to act without empathy or conscience. This woman got what she bargained for; the family did not. Affairs are betrayals. They are simply not motivated by genuine love on the part of any of the participants. Abandoning one's integrity or encouraging another to abandon his or her integrity while risking the psychological well-being of other people is something else all together. She might be "in love" with Sanford, but you will never convince me that she loves him. There is a major difference.
Ads by Google